<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Functional Programming on Luke Wassink</title><link>http://lukewassink.com/tags/functional-programming/</link><description>Recent content in Functional Programming on Luke Wassink</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 15:33:45 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://lukewassink.com/tags/functional-programming/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>From Categories to Types</title><link>http://lukewassink.com/posts/categories-to-types/</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 15:33:45 -0400</pubDate><guid>http://lukewassink.com/posts/categories-to-types/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="who-is-this-for"&gt;&#10; Who is this for?&#10; &lt;a class="heading-link" href="#who-is-this-for"&gt;&#10; &lt;i class="fa-solid fa-link" aria-hidden="true" title="Link to heading"&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&#10; &lt;span class="sr-only"&gt;Link to heading&lt;/span&gt;&#10; &lt;/a&gt;&#10;&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;At this point, there are, by conservative estimate, 80,000 blog posts and&#10;Youtube videos that explain how monads fit into functional programming. It seems&#10;to be mandated by federal law that 99% of them begin by reassuring you that,&#10;unlike all the other explanations out there, &lt;em&gt;this explanation&lt;/em&gt; won&amp;rsquo;t use any&#10;fancy math or require any knowledge of category theory. This blog post belongs&#10;to the remaining 1%.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>